March for Life 2016, like many pro life groups, seems to embrace faux science, even in the face of repetitive fraternal corrections, says Prof. Dianne Irving, in her recent piece discussing the matter. It is not a matter of not knowing, but rather choosing to embrace outdated or ill informed statements that have no bearing in scientific data.
One such phrase that drives ESH up a wall is “from conception to natural death”, often quoted by religious and pro-life sources, which is prima faciae a gross scientific untruth. Such a phrase rules out defending the right to life of babies conceived by artificial means (e.g. IVF, ART, et alia) and natural means (e.g. twinning in the womb of identical twins).
Read Irving’s well elucidated truth in the link above and…PLEASE…stop using faux science and calling it pro life.
This video is pretty graphic and shows how depraved these soulless ghouls are. #DefundKlanBarrenhood #PPSellsBabyParts
From Greater Cincinnati RTL release today:
“The Center for Medical Progress has released its seventh video, entitled Human Capital – Episode 3: Planned Parenthood’s Custom Abortions for a Superior Product. Featured is a former StemExpress procurement technician describing abortion of intact babies bodies, then dissected for sale and distribution for research.
Contact Ohio Governor John “Janko” Kasich to end all tax funding (our money) to Planned Parenthood immediately; phone: 614/466-3555.”
It’s a sick, sick world in the land of soulless ghouls involved in Abortoholism, where they violate multiple laws, rip babies from their mothers’ wombs and sell the body parts like chattel.
There’s hue and outcry over Cecil the Lion, who’s fatherless cub was killed now by a rival male lion. But none for the millions of babies shred and sold like a slave at the market. The dripping hypocrisy of the left is telling and will leave many to be judged and judged harshly by the Pantocrator in due time.
Here’s the 6th and latest video from the Center for Medical Progress on #KlanBarrenhood and their gruesome continuing satanic story:
ESH strongly encourages all readers to join enmasse to #DefundKlanBarrenhood. #PPSellsBabyParts.
The big national rally protest against #KlanBarrenhood will be Saturday, August 22. People will be participating in over 180 cities.
Do try to join in your locale. For more info, see here….
Selling “crunchy” baby body parts so a medical director can buy a Lamborghini? The largest domestic terrorist group is crying foul.
It is readily apparent that the cries of Klan Barrenhood about being persecuted for 10 years by peaceful, prayerful, non violent pro-lifers ring hollow to anyone paying minimal attention to the abortion wars.
Pharmer puts it well this way:
“…Let the public be reminded that Planned Parenthood has been harassing pharmacists for 15 years or more, in an attempt to force the pro-lifers to dispense abortifacient drugs, with their efforts leading to success in a number of states. In fact, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Ohio intervened directly in the employment lawsuit between this pharmacist and K Mart way back in 2001, in order to delay the inevitable outcome…”
They were also active behind the scenes in the persecution of IL pharmacists by the convict Rod “Slobodan” Blagojevich going back to at least 2005. “Slobodan” worked with Walgreens executives to harrass and fired pharmacists with a conscience–sometimes during the overnight graveyard shift–as he had the IL assembly pass an illegal act, later overturned by all competent courts on the matter. Even a diktat from a felon Serbian ex-governor does not trump civil and religious rights of pharmacists in the workplace. PP was right there, egging Blago on.
Says Pharmer in the same piece: “Planned Parenthood has been attacking pro-life health care professionals and Crisis Pregnancy Centers for decades.” Let’s not forget their role in various states working to illegally strip the rights of religion and conscience for pharmacists and other health professionals, as well as harassing CPCs, as they did in CT and NY under Client #9, the ex-gov. and ex-AG Sidney Blumenthal.
Have a look see…
In a wierd volte face, the GOP is fighting and clawing for OTC abortifacients (e.g. the Pill, Plan B, etc) and the Dems and Klan Barrenhood–the largest domestic terrorist group–are fighting AGAINST the measure. At least as far as who will pay for these carcinogenic abortifacients.
Naturally Sen Patty Murray (D-WA) and fellow abortoholics want more dead preborn babies and more womyn polluting their bodies with these high dose steroids. And GOP members led by some rookies like Cory Gardner (R-CO) and the two NC senators, are all for it, but not on the Obamacare ATM ride. Gardner, in fact, ran on the issue in his run last year for the Senate
The bill upholds requirements in the Affordable Care Act mandating access to prescription birth control covered by insurance companies, so over-the-counter birth control would be covered without new costs.
“I believe strongly that women should be able to get the comprehensive health care they need when they need it, without being charged extra, without asking permission and without politicians interfering,” Murray said.
So do Republicans, according to Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., who unveiled a GOP proposal late last month that also aims to make birth control pills available without a prescription. The bill makes good on a campaign pledge by Gardner in his successful election against incumbent Democratic Sen. Mark Udall. The race focused almost singularly on women’s health care and reproductive rights.
Gardner’s bill would allow for over-the-counter birth control, and includes a proposal that would allow women to pay for it through health savings accounts. Gardner’s bill would put an age restriction for access to adults 18 years and above; Murray’s plan has no age restrictions.
This will mean more chemical abortions, more womyn contracting various cancers from these toxic steroids, and more health care costs related to the hundreds of side effects that womyn suffer from these abortifacients. And if approved, that will mean less follow up and care for womyn procuring these carcinogens OTC.
Way to go, GOP!
Although it may get some readings and generate some heat rather than light, the proposed bill in the OH Assembly–Abortion Inducing Drugs–will be DOA. Even if it were to pass the rigorous task of clearing the House and Senate, RINO Gov John “Janko” Kasich, busy getting ready for a presidential run, will also likely ignore it as well.
The bill only talks about the sole drug with an abortion indication–mifepristone–which is often used in combination with the protsaglandin misoprostol, the latter which increases contractions. the former which literally “starves” the developing baby of needed progesterone from mom early in the pregnancy.
The news release from Cincy RTL, while well intended, only addresses one other drug used as an abortifacient, methotrexate (MTX), a drug developed for cancer and also used in certain drug-resistant forms of thematoid arthritis.
It totally misses or intentionally ignores the other common abortifacients that makes some “pro lifers” squeemish and squirmy: the combination oral “contraceptive” Pill, Plan B (and its generic versions), ella (the chemical cousin of mifepristone…gasp!), Depo Provera, Implanon, various IUDs and so on…all ignored in the release and the bill. don’t want to offend those who are killing millions of preborn babies via their faux “contraceptive, now do we?
ESH guesses what the OH legislators and their non-pharmacist “consultants” at various pro life groups coulda-shoulda done was consult the real drug specialists in the pro life community the past 31 years, Pharmacists For Life International. ESH has confimed that never occured, a common snub by compromising pro life groups filled with “know nothings”. PFLI is a total protection, 100% pro-life group which doesn’t compromise on principles and that usually too much to bear by those who would, such as National RTL and Ohio RTL.
From PFLI’s main page on their website:
308,000,000 estimated deaths since Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton Estimated killed by all means: chemical, mechanical and surgical abortion since 1973
More on PFLI’s website…you get the drift, check it all out there:
We all know from expeirence in the abortion wars, that the abortoholics–those lovers of killing innocent preborn babies with glee but recoiling at, say, killing a caribou to survive–have wanted to impose THEIR immorality on the rest of normal, life loving everyday folks.
They did so in 1973 with the twin abortion decisions of Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton. They did so with the 1963 Griswold v Connecticut “contraceptive” decision. And with many other lawsuits, to many to mention.
With Obamacare, socialized medicine, they want to ram “contraception” and abortion down everyone’s throat, to like it, AND to pay for it. Without apologies. Although some of those impositions are being rolled back–5 decisions now have upheld conscience religious rights of employers and others–many have not. And that doesn’t include at least 38 instances where the Kenyan kommie has rewritten Obamacare rules on his own, by fiat, by his diktat.
Count on it soon: as part of the Kenyan kommie’s war on Christianity and life, it will soon be mandated: kill or get out of pharmacy or medicine. Period.
See here to get an idea where this is heading. It’s parallel twin evil is making sodomites mainstream, loveless sewer “luv” without the requisite propagation of human life as happens with normal marriage within the institution meant only for one man, one woman.
We can look to a famous propagandist for his view on rights of conscience for health professionals:
Well, we now have two biosimilars approved in the US with the FDA’s marketing approval of Sandoz / Momenta’s copycat version of Copaxone for relapsing-forms of multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammation and neurodegeneration.
Glatopa (which sounds like something ESH’s parents left behind in stari kraj) will be the real game changer in the world of biosimilars. Maybe.
The first biosimilar approved (also from Sandoz….. a copy of Amgen’s Neupogen) doesn’t and won’t have the same market-changing impact in a well-defined therapeutic category like MS – so this would be the one to watch, ESH thinks.
Çekaj! TEVA, the Israeli firm which is very steamed up about this copycat stealing their market share, is still likely to find yet more roadblocks to keep Glatopa off the market (even the US Supreme Court refused to stop Sandoz) – at least for a short while.
We know that the ‘naming’ convention issue has not yet been settled with the FDA. So will the package insert say the same as Copaxone – glatiramer acetate injection? Curious minds want to know! And, the regulations related to ‘interchangeability’ have yet to be issued by the FDA.
So, will Glatopa be listed as an A/B rated product? Or some other designation? In the article here there is a clear reference to being fully substitutable at the pharmacy level. (Remains to be seen.)
Also, what about all those states (we know the Kenyan kommie thinks there are 57) that have a say in pharmacy regulations and some even have legislation already passed making biosimilar launches very difficult as we have covered in earlier alerts.
Another important point from reimbursement standpoint and economic impact to health plans and governmental payers: the cost for Glatopa has not been released (that’s no surprise…. Sandoz still has to factor in all their legal expenses and other A&O costs to get this product to market).
That may be one of the most interesting elements of this journey to the biosimilar side.
Show you care about women in a crisis pregnancy who are trying to do the right thing for their preborn babies; donate to the PFLI GoFundMe campaign today…any amount is gratefully appreciated!
Pharmacists For Life International is the only pharmacy association which is exclusively 100% total protection pro-life, something no other pharmacy organization can say (or would have the courage to say!). PFLI is a worldwide apostolate of thousands of pharmacists, plus hundreds of other health professionals, pharmacy students, interns, pharmacy technicians, and the public, in the USA, Canada and worldwide. We are represented on all of the continents except Antarctica, with active regional coordinators in many states and nations.
Image is for display purposes only; actual brand of vitamins donated are generic equivalents
PFLI’s mission is to make pharmacy once again a life-saving profession, a mooring from which it has drifted. As part of this commitment, PFLI is actively involved in educating pharmacists, nurses, physicians and other health professionals; educating the general public; serving pregnancy care centers; providing an economical speakers bureau; providing pharmaceutical cognitive services and consulting services; offering a toll-free contact phone number; providing on-line Internet and e-mail services; and providing many other benefits for members and non-members, pharmacists, lay persons, and students.
PFLI was founded in Cleveland, OH by four pharmacists of conscience. PFLI’s founding statement from May 1984 states: “PFLI defends, upholds and protects the sanctity of all human life from conception to natural death, regardless of age, biological stage, handicap or place of residence.”
You have read here and in other venues, the long and successful legal battle of the Storman family of pharmacies in WA state the past few years. they took on the abortoholic pols and won.
However, that has set them back around $140K in legal bills. This is a great way to give alms during Holy Lent, and help a stalwart pro-life family chain of pharmacies overcome the culture of death on the Left coast.
Fropm Pharmer’s blog a few weeks ago:
“The Stormans Family has been battling the coercive leftist abortion supporters for YEARS, regarding their right to refuse to dispense certain types of birth control which have abortive mechanisms of action. They won their case at home, but are being soaked for legal fees as their First Amendment case is being appealed to the 9th Circuit Court. Read more about the appeal at LifeNews.
“There’s a Go Fund Me campaign to help out this family, and allow them to stay true to their religious and ethical beliefs as they practice pro-life pharmacy.
“Please understand that the primary drug in question, levonorgestrel, or Plan B One-Step is now an over the counter drug. The entire environment of practice regarding this drug entity has changed while the Stormans legal battle has been going on. In addition, it has been established that Plan B is ineffective for American women of average size. ( Learn more at the Chemical Abortion page of this blog.) The pharmacists who refuse to dispense Plan B have effectively been protecting these women from being sold a bogus “remedy”. The point of continued legal persecution of this family is moot.
In what can only be called child abuse of the worst kind, it has been revealed that at least 609 young girls under the age of 16 in N Ireland have been inserted with abortifacient progestin rods, often without parental knowledge or approval.
An 11-year-old is among more than 600 girls under the age of 16 in Northern Ireland given contraceptive implants in the last five years.
Rods inserted into the arm release hormones to stop egg production and prevent pregnancy.
While the age of consent is 16, parental consent for the treatment is not legally needed as long as young people are capable of understanding it.
Health trusts provided the figures to BBC Radio Ulster’s Nolan Show.
Overall, 609 under-16s received implants in the past five years, although one trust could only provide figures for last year:
- In the Western Trust, 237 girls were treated (177 were aged 15; 48 were aged 14; 11 were aged 13 and one was aged 11)
- Joint figures covering the Belfast and South Eastern trusts show 207 girls under 16 received the treatment (they say their data only additionally records under 14s, of which there were six 13-year-olds who were referred to follow-up sexual and reproductive health meetings)
- In the Northern Trust, 150 under-16s were treated (the breakdown of girls’ ages was only available from 2012 – since then, 30 girls were aged 15; 21 were 14-years-old; and one was aged 13)
- The Southern Trust could only provide figures for the past year: in total, 15 under 16s received the treatment (10 were aged 15; three were aged 14; and two were 13)
It is not clear what the personal circumstances are of the individual girls who were seeking treatment. It is unknown if the government, which is often complicit or promoting this child abuse, will investigate and/or prosecute these perps who destroy the innocence of young girls and subject them to class I carcinogens, as defined by the WHO.
Said long time bench researcher and philosopher professor Dr Dianne Irving, “What are the long term effects if a girl’s ovaries are hormonally prevented from producing ‘eggs’? Would it eventually leave her infertile? What if her ovaries do produced eggs and are fertilized? Presumably the hormones in these arm inserts prevent the new embryo still in the fallopian tube from implanting or kills it after implanting (abortifacient). Where’s the data? Human traffickers must love this. Probably know how to insert [the rods] themselves.”
Liletta (levonorgestrel) Intrauterine Device – formerly Levosert
Company: Medicines360 and Actavis plc
Date of Approval: February 27, 2015
Treatment for: Contraception [abortifacient mechanism of action, chemically and mechanically]
Liletta (levonorgestrel) is a hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) for use by women to prevent pregnancy for up to three years. The basic mechanism of action is abortifacient by action of the progestin levonorgestrel–which is poor at supressing ovulation–and the mechanical irritation of the endometrium after junior has been conceived and implanted in the womb.
- FDA Approves Liletta (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) to Prevent Pregnancy for up to Three Years– February 27, 2015
- Medicines360 and Actavis Announce FDA Acceptance for Filing of NDA for Levosert IUD– July 21, 2014
FDA approves first biosimilar product filgrastim-sndz
FDA News Release (03/06/15)
ESH is pleased to report that the FDA approved Friday filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio—Sandoz), the first approved biosimilar product in the United States. The drug is biosimilar to filgrastim (Neupogen—Amgen), which was licensed in 1991. Filgrastim-sndz — which is approved for the same indications as Amgen’s drug — can be prescribed for patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy; patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving induction or consolidation chemotherapy; patients with cancer undergoing… Read More
The drug is made by Sandoz, formerly a 120 yr old Swiss drug firm that created the hallucinogenic drug LSD in the 1940s/50s when searching for psychotropics drugs that eventually led to its then-blockbuster, Mellaril, inter alia. Sandoz, which strictly makes generics now, has been part of conglomerate Novartis for several decades now. It also encompasses the former CIBA-Geigy.
Novartis manufactures such drugs as clozapine (Clozaril), diclofenac (Voltaren), carbamazepine (Tegretol), valsartan (Diovan) and imatinib mesylate (Gleevec/Glivec). Additional agents include cyclosporin (Neoral/Sandimmun), letrozole (Femara), methylphenidate (Ritalin), terbinafine (Lamisil), and others.
In 1996, Ciba-Geigy merged with Sandoz, and the pharmaceutical and agrochemical divisions of both companies formed Novartis as an independent entity. Other Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz businesses were sold, or like Ciba Specialty Chemicals, spun off as independent companies. The Sandoz brand disappeared for 3 years, but was revived in 2003 when Novartis consolidated its generic drugs businesses into a single subsidiary and named it Sandoz. Novartis divested its agrochemical and genetically modified crops business in 2000 with the spinout of Syngenta in partnership with AstraZeneca, which also divested its agrochemical business.
The first barrier has finally been broken in the patent monopolies Big Pharma-Biotech has had in the faster growing and most expensive part of the drug industry. Teva has been, so far successfully, blocking biosimilar copies of its MS drug, Copaxone.
ESH instructs readers to look for that barrier to be broken later this year.
Pharmacist Steve, he of blogging phame, poses several questions that go to the heart of the totally necessary rights of conscience for pharmacists and all health care professionals as the left wing death machine tightens its grips on who will live, who will die and who will be allowed to earn a living when they resist this evil:
From his blog last Saturday 2/21/15, ESH emphasis on the abortifacient Plan B:
“Can you imagine this… WALGREENS cannot tell a Pharmacist to fill or not fill a control Rx that they are not comfortable with…but.. WALGREENS have fired Pharmacists who are “not comfortable” providing vaccinations or Plan B ..
“Does this suggest that Walgreens does have some influence over what prescriptions/products Pharmacists are allowed to fill or decline.. and since the above two categories do not include controlled meds.. would suggest that pts who have a medical necessity for controlled meds are being discriminated against?”
Pharmacist Steve asks the same question that pharmacists with a conscience have been asking and demanding for well now 30 years, those who will not participate in the killing machine of the omnipotent, godless secular state, driven by freemasonic thinking, in killing innocent preborns, or elderly ill patients. They are all patients, all with lives that intrinsically matter and are beyond any demands of life and death that can be made by the death squads of the present Regime, or any subsequent regime.
WAGS started their firing spree of pharmacists with a conscience almost 10 yrs ago in their hometown of Chicago, at the behest of now imprisoned Rod “Slobodan” Blagojevich, he who had a law passed, and overturned several times, that violated pharmacist rights of conscience and principles of freedom of religion under both IL and US constitutions.
Has WAGS not learned its lesson yet? Will they continue to be bad actors now that they have bought UK based Boots so they can avoid paying US taxes? Can pharmacists make professional judgment decisions, but yet fill any order placed before them, something one could arguably train a monkey to do?
While you’re communicating with your state rep and/or senator, please remind them to pass a Healthcare Rights of Conscience bill this year for pharmacists and all health care professionals and to INSIST that Gov John Kasich (R) stop with the pro-life lipservice and appoint a pro-life, pro-family pharmacist to the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy.
ESH is not surprised some medical individuals and organizations still have some sense about them, even in the present phantasmagoric world of lib unreality. The recent DNC/left generated faux discussion on measles outbreaks and their desire for mandatory, government-enforced vaccinations using the only source of many vax from the cells of murdered, dismembered, tiny aborted human babies.
Here’s a piece on the AMA OPPOSING mandatory vaccinations promoted by big government libs, who seldom take their own advice in the area, no doubt so only they have the god-like ‘choice’. Note the recent measles ‘outbreak’ focused mostly in heavily blue state CA, chiefly in areas of highly dense populations of libs. The intro commentary is from Prof Dianne Irving, former bench and research scientist as well as high caliber philosophy professor who knows her Aristotle, etc.
[Note: I would also add, frankly, given the well-documented sorry state of the supposed “science” involved in producing these various vaccines, that the administration of such vaccines really amounts to experimental and therapeutic research rather than standard medical care — and not even reliable research at that. This is essentially the unethical use of human subjects (e.g., children) in research. And aside from the false data used by the producers, to force parents to have their children vaccinated would also violate not only our U.S. Federal OHRP regulations for the protection of human subjects in research [45 CFR 46]:
[http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/regbook2013.pdf.pdf], as well as international codes of ethics for the use of human subjects in research — such as the Declaration of Helsinki [http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1760318&utm_source=Silverchair%20Information%20Systems&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=JAMA%3AOnlineFirst10%2F19%2F2013], the Nuremberg Code. Note the following principles from the Nuremberg Code, and their similarity with the American Medical Association’s document in the article below:
THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
o This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
o The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably [sic] cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Hopefully the AMA will not decide to change its position after reading the following article. — DNI]
February 10, 2015
by Mike Adams
According to the “Informed Consent” section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics posted at the American Medical Association website, the AMA is fundamentally and unambiguously opposed to mandatory vaccine programs in America. Read the AMA’s Code of Medical Ethics statement here. [http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion808.page]
A mandatory vaccination policy — forced vaccination of unwilling recipients — is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the consent of the patient or the patient’s parents. This directly violates the very clear language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:
The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment… Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent.
“Physicians must honor” informed consent
The AMA’s Code of Medical Ethics statement is very clear: “physicians must honor” the policy of informed consent. In fact, the AMA describes this as “a basic policy in both ethics and law” and only makes exception if the patient “is unconscious” or if harm from failure to treat “is imminent.”
Mandatory vaccine interventions are conducted in total violation of this code of ethics. Most unvaccinated children are in a state of perfect health, with no symptoms and no active disease. There is no “imminent” risk of harm from “failure to treat.”
Because the mainstream media is desperately trying to confuse the public about the very definition of “medical consent,” here is the Dictionary.com definition of “consent”:
verb – to permit, approve, or agree; comply or yield (often followed by to or an infinitive)
He consented to the proposal. We asked her permission, and she consented.
Patients deserve an “informed choice”
The AMA’s Code of Ethics statement furthermore says that patients possess a “right of self-decision” and that this right can only be effectively exercised “if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice.”
Nearly all vaccinations are carried out in direct violation of this medical code of ethics because patients are almost never handed vaccine insert sheets, and the very real risks of vaccination are almost never explained to anyone. In fact, virtually the entire medical establishment operates in a state of total denial that any vaccine risks exist at all. This, too, is a striking violation of the AMA’s code of ethics.
It is also an outright abandonment of all logic and medical reality, as every medical intervention comes with some level of risk, even if that risk is small. It is not zero, as is routinely and repeatedly claimed by vaccine fanatics.
Doctors should “respectfully” explain treatment options to patients
The AMA’s Code of Ethics further states “Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients.”
Instead, what we actually see in America today is:
• Belligerent doctors verbally berating patients for asking intelligent, informed questions about vaccine ingredients and vaccine side effects.
• Arrogant doctors threatening to cut off all medical treatment from patients unless they agree to a coerced medical intervention (vaccinations).
• Doctors and hospitals calling law enforcement authorities on families, then staging the state seizure of children while threatening parents with arrest and imprisonment (medical kidnapping).
These actions are so far removed from the AMA’s Code of Ethics that they call into question the very real question of whether the entire medical system has utterly abandoned any shred of medical ethics at all.
A campaign of intellectual bigotry carried out in the name of science
Today, medical obedience to mandatory vaccines is being aggressively demanded by rage-filled doctors, health authorities and media outlets. A vicious campaign of intellectual bigotry has been unleashed against all vaccine skeptics, with malicious tactics such as equating skeptical thinkers who seek to avoid mercury with people who still think the Earth is flat.
There is no question that such malicious tactics against concerned moms are being conducted in total violation of the AMA’s own Code of Ethics, which also states that “The physician’s obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient’s care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice.”
This code of medical ethics means doctors may educate patients and even respectfully urge them to follow a particular course of action, but they may not coerce, threaten, intimidate or otherwise verbally berate patients who disagree with their suggested course of action.
Here’s the full statement from the AMA’s Code of Ethics page, section 8.08 – Informed Consent:
The patient’s right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician’s obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient’s care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent. In special circumstances, it may be appropriate to postpone disclosure of information, (see Opinion E-8.122, “Withholding Information from Patients”).
Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients. The quantity and specificity of this information should be tailored to meet the preferences and needs of individual patients. Physicians need not communicate all information at one time, but should assess the amount of information that patients are capable of receiving at a given time and present the remainder when appropriate. (I, II, V, VIII)
Because we believe the AMA will, after seeing this investigative story, attempt to alter or revoke this medical ethics document, we are also posting a screen shot of the AMA’s page sourced on February 9, 2015:
Entire mainstream media now urging total abandonment of the AMA’s own Code of Ethics
What else is fascinating about this finding is the realization that the entire mainstream media is almost fanatically screaming for the wholesale abandonment of the very principles of medical ethics endorsed by the AMA in its own words.
Almost everywhere in the media, the public is now being berated and screamed at in the name of “SCIENCE!” while vaccine skeptics are being derided as “kooks” and “nut jobs” because they have questions about vaccines that the vaccine industry refuses to answer. Those reasonable, rational questions include inquiries concerning the toxic effects of vaccine ingredients, the history of faked vaccine research, the CDC scientist’s confession of a vaccine cover-up at the CDC, the admission that many current vaccines are backed by no clinical trials, and even questions about why the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has already paid out billions of dollars in proven vaccine damages at the same time the medical system claims vaccines have never harmed anyone and don’t cause dangerous side effects.
All of this activity carried out in witch hunt fashion by the mainstream media and vaccine fanatics posing as “scientists” is conducted in gross violation of the AMA’s own Code of Ethics, which calls for doctors to respectfully inform patients of their choices, then allow the patient to make their own informed choice.
Six questions for the AMA
Here are six important questions for the AMA:
#1) Will you now denounce the vaccine fanatics who are calling for vaccines to be forced onto people without their consent?
#2) If not, will you revoke the AMA’s Code of Ethics and abandon what have already called a fundamental “patient right” to be informed and make their own decision about medical interventions?
#3) Will you publicly condemn doctors who are using tactics of coercion, verbal abuse, intimidation and threats against patients who have reasonable questions about vaccine safety? If not, will you publicly endorse their tactics and encourage them to be used even more frequently?
#4) If, as you state on the AMA website, “Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor,” then will you insist that your own AMA members follow this policy? Or is it acceptable that they almost universally violate this policy as part of a “vaccine lynch mob” mentality that has now swept across the minds of the medical profession?
#5) If the AMA does not immediately denounce the widespread vaccine violations of its own Code of Ethics, then what medical ethics does the AMA actually stand for, if any? Are there any limits to the coercion tactics doctors may use against patients to force them into medical treatments demanded by doctors?
#6) If the AMA abandons its own code of medical ethics, then how can patients trust doctors who are AMA members to act with any sense of ethics at all?
Sources for this story include:
From Phil Lawler’s article this week discussing the social uproar over measles, vaccinations and conscientious objections, in the moral arena.
The DNC and the left want to make this their “war on women” theme against the GOP for the 2016 elections, but it is about more than just the juvenile pedantics of the left. It is not some sound bite that the GOP is anti-science (yet the abortoholic left denies the science of 4D ultrasounds clearly showing the humanity of preborns?)
It is an opportunity to re-visit an area that often impacts the lives of families wishing to live a moral life, untainted by material cooperation with the demonic evil of killing innocent preborn babies so Big Pharma like Merck can force immoral vaccines made from immoral sources down the throats of the plebes.
The resistance will not cave so easily.
Please see the link from the Pontifical Academy for Life when it drafted this document in 2005 that, IMNHO, it may have magisterial weight since it was approved by John Paul II.
The summary is notable, especially the first line, in light of the recent political discussions around vaccinations and those objecting to them, especially for religious and moral reasons. This hype in the drive by media is a political tactic of the DNC and the left for the 2016 election (much like the “war on women” strategy of 2012), in an effort to demonize their opponents.
ESh thinks it offers an opportunity to re-visit a moral problem often ignored or misunderstood, even by pro-lifers and devout Catholics.
- More info on morally acceptable/unacceptable vaccines: http://www.cogforlife.org/vaccine-overview/
- More info on Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute founded by researcher/pharmacist Dr Theresa Deisher: http://www.cogforlife.org/soundchoice/
- Why is there a measles outbreak? Look directly for vax maker Merck which refuses to make its MMR and varicella vax from anything BUT aborted cells: http://www.cogforlife.org/2015/01/26/measles-outbreak-blame-merck-not-parents/
- Other Vatican documents on the topic: http://www.cogforlife.org/the-vatican-vaccines-from-abortion/
To summarize, it must be confirmed that:
- –there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems;
- – as regards the vaccines without an alternative, the need to contest so that others may be prepared must be reaffirmed, as should be the lawfulness of using the former in the meantime insomuch as is necessary in order to avoid a serious risk not only for one’s
- own children but also, and perhaps more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole – especially for pregnant women;
- – the lawfulness of the use of these vaccines should not be misinterpreted as a declaration of the lawfulness of their production, marketing and use, but is to be understood as being a passive material cooperation and, in its mildest and remotest sense, also active, morally justified as an extrema ratio due to the necessity to provide for the good of one’s children and of the people who come in contact with the children (pregnant women);
- – such cooperation occurs in a context of moral coercion of the conscience of parents, who are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.
From ALL/STOPP’s 2014 report on Klan Parenthood, the largest domestic terrorist organization in the US:
Planned Parenthood recently released its 2013-2014 annual report, giving the latest data on its finances and its services. The purpose of this facilities report is to add a historical perspective on Planned Parenthood’s
operations and use that to identify where Planned Parenthood is today and what actions it will be taking in the short-term.
In its annual report, Planned Parenthood said it committed 327,653 abortions in 2013, had a record income of $1.3 billion, and a near-record profit of $127.1 million — giving the impression of a thriving organization. However, when one digs deeper in the service numbers in the annual report, a different picture of PP’sstatus emerges . . .
• Planned Parenthood did fewer abortions last year than it did in three of its last four years.
• Planned Parenthood’s customer base fell to its lowest level since 2001.
• The number of PP female contraceptive customers is lower than nine of its last 12 years.
• Planned Parenthood breast and cervical cancer screenings have dropped 40-60 percent since 2009.
The data presented in this report on Planned Parenthood facilities in the United States will provide insight on why PP is seeing the decline in its services and what it plans to do to correct the decline. This report will show:
• During 2014, Planned Parenthood Federation of America continued to close “health centers”
at a record rate. This year, it closed 34 centers in a total of 19 different states (see Table 1).
• Planned Parenthood now operates 668 centers [ESH note: decreased to 666 recently after this report released] in the United States, of which 337 commit surgical and/or medical abortions. Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion chain, operating 45.6 percent of all the surgical/medical abortion facilities (see Table 2).
• This year is the first time in 10 years that Planned Parenthood had fewer surgical abortion centers AND fewer medical abortion centers AND fewer total number of surgical/medical abortion centers (see Table 3).
• There is only one state where Planned Parenthood has consistently grown the number of its centers.
• Planned Parenthood operates medical facilities in all but one state.
Two other items not discussed in detail in this report, but are in the actual PPFA annual report: 1) PP depends on our taxes for nearly half its income and now collects more than a half billion $$$ from US taxpayers; and 2) not reported with any fanfare is that PP handed out about 1.4 million Plan B-type morning after abortion kits, so the reporting of 350,000 abortions reflects only about 20% of ALL abortions perpetrated by the PP killing machine. On top of that PP protects child and sex abusers, as been exposed numerous times by Live Action and Project Veritas, inter alia.
PP Government income in 2013: $540.6 million—44.7% of total income
PP Government income in 2012: $542.4 million—45% of total income
PP Government income in 2011: $538.5 million—44% of total income
PP Government income in 2010: $487.4 million—46.5% of total income