MN vice guv candidate oversaw 10,000+ abortions at PP

Posted on

Did the running mate of MN guv Mark Dayton oversee over 10,000+ surgical abortions as VP of Klan Parenthood in MN? As they say in that part of the country, “you betcha!”

Does Peyton Manning favor the word “Omaha”?

You betcha.

Tina Smith, as the local VP of the largest domestic terrorist group should know that the issue could work against her, even in the People’s Paradise Republic of MN.

With Election Day less than two weeks away, one Minnesota pro-life group is saying voters should reject Democratic Lt. Governor nominee Tina Smith because of her past ties with Klan Parenthood.

Featured Image

Smith, who has served as incumbent Gov Mark Dayton’s chief of staff since 2011, has transitioned to join Dayton’s re-election effort as his running mate. However, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life says Smith’s background as a vice president for Planned Parenthood from 2003 to 2006 should disqualify her from holding the state’s second-ranking politician.

In a blog post, the pro-life group notes that Klan Parenthood did more than 10,000 abortions in MN during her three-year tenure.

But that’s not entirely true. MCCL is just counting the surgical abortions.

Recall, in its most recent 2012 report, PP brags about dispensing at least 1.4 million chemical abortifacients aka Plan B, “morning after pill” or whatever one will call high doses of the potent steroid levonorgestrel. So, figuring on some calculations of proportion, figure in AT LEAST another 80-100,0000 chemical abortions at PP under Smith, and that’s lowball numbers.


Steroids are bad for all athletes and can cause up to a year ban or longer in the NFL. So it’s OK to give them to underage, undeveloped teenagers? Girls who may be the victims of rape and incest or sexual slavery?

According to Tina Smith, “you betcha!”

PS…lemmee guess…is Dayton related to the Dayton-Hudson mega-rich group owners of Target (pron. tar-zhey) stores?

Hey, Cardinal Dolan, remember when?

Posted on

NYC had a real Catholic as an archbishop?












Oh yeah, there was one in recent memory, just not in the US:

You tried to kick him out, just as the Arians did to St Athanasius on FOUR occassions. Even the conciliar popes realized the mistake of 1988, and lifted the unjust and illicit “excommunications” ex post facto.

Hey, if you can do it for a schismatic orthodox prelate from 1054 you certainly can do it for a bona fide, honest to goodness, dyed in the wool Traditional Catholic archbishop!

Pope Francis: the slam that keeps on giving

Posted on

Pope Francis misses no opportunity to slam Traditional Catholics any time he can. Oh, he tried to be “fair and balanced” in his closing remarks to the recent Synod XIV, but he’s no Fox News, eh?

Here’s an article in toto from CNS, an in house service, with an emphasis from ESH near the end. Shown in the pic below is Cardinal Burke, recently confirming his deposement by the Pope with the secular website,  Buzzfeed:

SYNOD-CONCLUSION Oct-18-2014 (690 words) With photos. xxxi

Synod ends by affirming tradition, leaving controversial questions open

By Francis X. Rocca
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — After several days of animated debate over its official midterm report, the Synod of Bishops on the family agreed on a final document more clearly grounded in traditional Catholic teaching. Yet the assembly failed to reach consensus on especially controversial questions of Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried and the pastoral care of homosexuals.

The synod’s last working session, Oct. 18, also featured a speech by Pope Francis, in which he celebrated the members’ frank exchanges while warning against extremism in the defense of tradition or the pursuit of progress.

Cardinal Vincent Nichols of Westminster, England, talks with Cardinal Raymond L. Burke, prefect of the Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature, as they leave the concluding session of the extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family at the Vatican Oct. 18. Also pictured is Italian Cardinal Carlo Caffarra of Bologna, center. (CNS/Paul Haring)

Discussions in the synod hall had grown heated after the Oct. 13 delivery of a midterm report that used strikingly conciliatory language toward people with ways of life contrary to church teaching, including divorced and civilly remarried Catholics, cohabitating couples and those in same-sex unions.

The summaries of working-group discussions, published Oct. 16, showed a majority of synod fathers wanted the final document to be clearer about relevant church doctrine and give more attention to families whose lives exemplify that teaching.

The final report, which the pope ordered published almost at once after the synod’s conclusion, featured many more citations of Scripture, as well as new references to the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the teachings of Pope Paul VI, St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI.

Synod fathers voted on each of the document’s 62 paragraphs. All received a simple majority, but three failed to gain the two-thirds supermajority ordinarily required for approval of synodal documents.

Two of those paragraphs dealt with a controversial proposal by German Cardinal Walter Kasper that would make it easier for divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to receive Communion. The document noted disagreements on the subject and recommended further study.

The document’s section on homosexuality, which also fell short of supermajority approval, was significantly changed from its counterpart in the midterm report.

The original section heading –“welcoming homosexuals” — was changed to “pastoral attention to persons with homosexual orientation.”

A statement that same-sex unions can be a “precious support in the life of the partners” was removed.

The final report quoted a 2003 document from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: “There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family.”

Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, told reporters that the absence of a supermajority indicated a lack of consensus and a need for more discussion, but stressed that none of the document carried doctrinal weight. The synod’s final report will serve as an agenda for the October 2015 world synod on the family, which will make recommendations to the pope.

Pope Francis said he welcomed the assembly’s expressions of disagreement.

“Personally, I would have been very worried and saddened if there hadn’t been these temptations and these animated discussions,” the pope said, “if everybody had agreed or remained silent in a false and quietistic peace.”

“So many commentators, or people who talk, imagined they saw the church quarreling, one part against the other, even doubting the Holy Spirit, the true promoter and guarantor of unity and harmony in the church,” he said.

While reassuring the assembly that the church’s unity was not in danger, Pope Francis warned against several temptations that he said had been present during the two-week synod.

One of the temptations he cited was that of “hostile rigidity” that seeks refuge in the letter of the law, “in the certainty of what we know and not of what we must still learn and achieve.” This temptation, he said, is characteristic of the “zealous, the scrupulous, the attentive and — today — of the so-called traditionalists and also of intellectuals.” [emphasis added ESH]

Another temptation for the synod fathers, the pope said, was that of “destructive do-goodism, which in the name of a misguided mercy binds up wounds without first treating and medicating them; that treats symptoms and not causes and roots. It is the temptation of do-gooders, of the timorous and also of the so-called progressives and liberals.”

Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said in a statement that he was “grateful that the clarifications and deepening of scriptural and theological reflection shine consistently” through the final report. “Now the real work begins!”



As November, month of Poor Souls approaches

Posted on Updated on

Time to do some great spiritual works of mercy for those who can only intercede for you after being released from the cleansing penance of Purgatory to the Beatific Vision.

ESH invites all readers, friend or foe, to participate in this work of mercy, as well as gaining a Plenary Indulgence under the usual conditions:

  • From Nov 1 to Nov 8 visit a cemetery with mental prayer for the poor souls
  • On Nov 2nd, All Souls Day under the Roman Rite calendarvisit a church or an oratory with one Our Father and one Creed being recited
  • A partial indulgence can be obtained any time of year by visiting a cemetery and praying for the poor souls


Six rules for a plenary indulgence:

  1. Be in the state of grace at least when performing the indulgenced act
  2. Complete detachment from sin, including venial sin
  3. Confession, within 8 days before or after the indulgenced act
  4. Holy Communion, within 8 days before or after the indulgenced act
  5. Prayers for the intention of the Supreme Pontiff
  6. Indulgenced act: a special good work with special conditions of place and time, such as above for the poor souls

“Holy Souls are eager for the prayers of the faithful which can gain indulgences for them. Their intercession is powerful. Pray unceasingly. We must empty Purgatory.”

–St Padre Pio

“It is a good and wholesome thing to pray for the dead, so they may be loosed from their sins.”

–II Maccabees 12:45

For our Byzantine and other Eastern Rite friends, they have 5 All Soul Saturdays during the year to commemorate and pray for the poor souls in Purgatory, 3 of those Saturdays fall during Great Lent. The first All Souls Saturday is the day before Meatfare Sunday in pre-lenten terms for the Eastern Rites. The fifth and last All Souls Saturday is the vigil of Pentecost. The Church Militant submit names to be remembered in a reading out loud called hramoty.  It resembles the panachida prayed at funeral wakes for the dead.

For more info on the latter, check it out here…

Abortion Barbie shows Abbott what size matters!

Posted on

Yep, folks, ESH cannot make this stuff up. In a year when the Dems will have their collective arses handed to them at the ballot box–one which they would love to stuff with 13-15 million illegal voters–Wendy “Abortion Barbie” Davis will have helped them seal their own losing fate.

And maybe their contempuous souls for all eternity with the damned if she doesn’t repent.

So she’s on the attack again. That’s what failed campaigns do when they have no ideas to solve real problems of real citizens.

This time it’s not attacking wheelchair-bound, handicapped Abbott. Oh no! It is something much more important than jobs, the economy, baby killing proclivities, crime or the festering ebola samples in Texas Presby Hospital.

It’s–drum roll–dildos!

And Abbott, so claims Abortion Barbie, is attacking womynfolk’s “right” to a dildo. The cad! [Sidebar: And no, ESH will not be showing visuals of Davis's sick objects.]

From the DC:

Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis earlier this month was pilloried in the press for her attack ad that prominently highlighted the fact that her Republican opponent Attorney General Greg Abbott uses a wheelchair. Davis took her attacks to a new level on Monday by strongly implying Abbott would support an interracial marriage ban, despite the fact that Abbott is married to a Latina. But less than three hours later, Davis again topped herself by forwarding an attack on Abbott about an unlikely issue: dildos.

In an emailed press release, Wendy Davis For Governor passed along an article from progressive magazine The Texas Observer entitled “Greg Abbott: Dildos? Against ‘em. Interracial Marriage? No Comment.” The piece attacks Abbott for his supposed reluctance to say whether he’d defend interracial marriage and his defense of Texas’ ban on the sale of sex toys. (RELATED: Even MSNBC Won’t Defend Wendy Davis Ad)

Gotta love that Abortion Barbie, her sneakers for killing babies and her love of inanimate objects used in a perverse manner.

You can view her sick ad here….just do it before lunch.

Also, in a nother perverse capitalist fundraiser, Davis is selling onesies promoting her failing campaign, for a mere $20. Guess that is an effort to make up for all the babies she would sentence to death in a suction vaccum of a TX abortion mill, kept unsanitarily open by the SCOTUS last week?

Why wouldn’t they?

Posted on

The Kenyan kommie stayed close to home in MD over the weekend, campaigning for good little Dems who have miraculously stayed on his Farm right out of the book, 1984.

And this, in a year, where they likely will get their clock cleaned better than it was in the tsunami of 2010 in state houses and legislatures. Not to mention both the House (more of a majority) and takeover of the Senate (and the corpse formerly known as Dingy happy, Magnum Farce aka Harry Reid).

U.S. President Barack Obama waves as he arrives for a campaign rally for Maryland Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown (R) at a High School in Upper Marlboro, Maryland October 19,  2014.  REUTERS-Kevin Lamarque

Is that guy MD Lt Gov Brown or a Romney wannabee?

Soon after getting their obligatory selfies, the crowd headed for the exits, en masse much to the consternation of the lib MD Dems and their “guests”.

It was a hoot, undoubtedly will be non-reported in the drive by state run media. Even though the latter is increasingly hostile to the Kenyan, albeit too late as he fades into his final 2 years as Dear Leader, President for Life.



Radical lesbian Houston mayor backs off sermon demands

Posted on

There’s a manly lesbian in Texas wishing she had not gone Lenin or Stalin on Christian pastors who teach the biblical truths regarding homosexuality and the sodomy lifestyle.

The mayor of Houston is backing away from her city’s demand that pastors turn their sermons over to the city. The statements, which came a day after a national outcry against subpoenas targeting five pastors, are the latest turn in a five-month fight over a local ordinance that has led to a lawsuit against the city.

Houston citizens filed the lawsuit to oppose the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (dubbed “HERO”), which gives biological males the right to use female facilities within the city and endows so-called “LGBT” citizens with the same employee civil rights status as blacks or women.

As part of the fact-finding portion of the lawsuit, the city demanded that pastors turn over “all speeches, presentations, or sermons related to HERO, the Petition, Mayor Annise Parker, homosexuality, or gender identity prepared by, delivered by, revised by, or approved by you or in your possession.”

Sounds like stuff komrade Vladimir Ilyich Lenin did on many occassions before and after the communist revolution in Russia. Or comrade Mao. Or dozens of other tyrants, dictators and despots.

Look for more legal action to expose and stop the unconstitutional activities of lesbian mayor Parker, er, hizzoner!